Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

106 F.3d 390

Docket No. 96-2375.

Alok Kumar v. Robert E. Cahill

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Jan. 9, 1997. Decided: Jan. 16, 1997.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1997-01-16

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Hoffmann v. Hoffmann

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1997-01-16

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-96-2435-L)

Alok Kumar, Appellant Pro Se.

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Alok Kumar appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kumar v. Cahill, No. CA-96-2435-L (D.Md. Aug. 30, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/106/f3d/390 · .json · Public domain