Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 F. Supp. 2d 579 - Frew v. Gilbert

109 F. Supp. 2d 579 - Frew v. Gilbert’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1320A (§ 1123 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396D (§ 1905 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396U (§ 1932 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 603 (§ 403 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Edelman v. Jordan · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) informing all persons in the State who are under the age of 21 and who have been determined to be eligible for medical assistance including services described in section 1396d(a)(4)(B) of this title, of the availability of early and periodic screening, diagnostic, and treatment services as described in section 1396d(r) of this title and the need for age-appropriate immunizations against vaccine-preventable diseases, (B) providing or arranging for the provision of such screening services in all cases where they are requested, (C) arranging for (directly or through referral to appropriate agencies, organizations, or individuals) corrective treatment the need for which is disclosed by such child health screening services, and (D) reporting to the Secretary (in a uniform form and manner established by the Secretary, by age group and by basis of eligibility for medical assistance, and by not later than April 1 after the end of each fiscal year, beginning with fiscal year 1990) file following information relating to early and periodic screening, diagnostic, and treatment services provided under the plan during each fiscal year: (i) the number of children provided child health screening services, (ii) the number of children referred for corrective treatment (the need for which is disclosed by such child health screening services), (iii) the number of children receiving dental services, and (iv) the State’s results in attaining the participation goals set for the State under sect”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Training, defendants correctly argue, is not a requirement of federal law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Early and periodic screening, diagnostic, and treatment services”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.