¶1Held, 1. That it is not necessary in the petition to allege that the debts of the petitioners are unsecured debts, when it is alleged that they are provable debts.
¶22. That the depositions in support of the petition in reference to the debts of the petitioners, must show that they were unsecured debts, as well as otherwise definitely describe them.
¶3Exceptions overruled as to the petition, sustained as to proof of debts, and leave given to petitioners to amend the proof of debts.