Ingalls

Supreme Court of the United States

March 23, 1891.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1891-03-23

ORIGINAL. No number. The case is stated in the opinion.

2 counsel of record

Relies on Dale Tile Manufacturing Co. v. Hyatt

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Petition denied / appeal dismissed · 9–0 · Decided 1891-03-23

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2001 · most notably Howe Scale Company of 1886 v. Wyckoff Seamans Benedict (1905), United States v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad (1957)

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

De Lagnel Berier, for motion.

Geo. W. Van Slyck, in opposition.

FULLER, C. J.

¶1

This is an application for a writ of error made to the court in session, under the apprehension on the part of counsel that it was directed to be so presented. We have therefore considered it, with the result that the writ must be denied. Manufacturing Co. v. Hyatt, 125 U. S. 46, 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 756; Machine Co. v. Skinuer, ante, 528. We wish it to be distinctly understood that in future no such application will be entertained, except when a justice of this court, upon consideration of the reord , has deemed it proper, under special circumstances, to indorse thereon a request that counsel be permitted to proceed in that way. Writ refused.