Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 Nev. 638 - Riley v. State

Riley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
December 2021
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently December 2021 · most notably Nika v. State (2008), Lader v. Warden, Northern Nevada Correctional Center (2005)

34 state decisions

1801994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Evitts v. Lucey · Adams v. Texas · In re Disbarment of Sabiston · McGuire v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to present an argument demonstrating the type and strength of evidence that might have been presented, and that there exists a reasonable probability that presentation of the evidence would have resulted in a different outcome at triar). We have reiterated these requirements when reviewing ineffective-assistance claims on appeal, making it clear that a petitioner's appellate briefs must address ineffective-assistance claims with specificity, not just”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “As a result, we hold that it was not ineffective assistance of counsel, without stronger indications, for [defense counsel] to have failed to order a psychiatric evaluation of [the appellant] based on the information contained in the pretrial evaluation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “advises the jury that it should view as suspect incriminating testimony given by those who are liable to prosecution for the identical charged offense as the accused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.