Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 F. Supp. 2d 142 - Lewis v. Grinker

111 F. Supp. 2d 142 - Lewis v. Grinker’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
December 2011
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 862A (§ 115 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395C (§ 1811 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395K (§ 1832 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396B (§ 1903 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396D (§ 1905 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Roe v. Wade · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Allen v. Wright · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “) aliens from receiving Medicaid-sponsored prenatal care, and, if so, whether that restriction is unconstitutional with respect to either the alien mothers or their United States citizen children. The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Lewis v. Thompson
  2. “It is a compelling government interest to enact new rules for eligibility and sponsorship agreements in order to assure that aliens be self-reliant in accordance with national immigration policy”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. Lewis v. Thompson
  3. “Current eligibility rules for public assistance . . . have proved wholly incapable of assuring that individual aliens not burden the public benefits system.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. Lewis v. Thompson

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.