Waterman v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
1897
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 1926
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Love v. Francis · Bevins v. Ramsey · Sullivan v. Haug · Sholty v. McIntyre · Cameron v. Calkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““These were cases in which the court refused to dismiss proceedings, where, owing to some default of the court or its officers, parties were prevented from taking appeals seasonably; and the opinions seem to make such cases exceptional.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““It follows, therefore, that all the requirements of the statute for taking and perfecting an appeal are deemed jurisdictional, and must be strictly complied with.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.