111 N.C. App. 260 - Lockamy v. Lockamy’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2007
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Howell v. Howell · Pulley v. Pulley · 101 N.C. App. 298 - Lutz v. Lutz · Pulley v. Pulley · Laughinghouse v. State ex rel. Ports Railway Comm.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Respondent did not lose her right to challenge the custody jurisdiction of the Superior Court of Stanly County by failing to appeal from the order[.] . . . ‘Jurisdiction over the subject matter cannot be conferred upon a court by consent, waiver or estoppel, and therefore failure to demur or object to the jurisdiction is immaterial.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`anticipates . . . an action for . . . equitable distribution shall be filed when it is appropriate to do so.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.