Roventini v. Ocular Sciences, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
16 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 334th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Barker CATV Construction, Inc. v. Ampro, Inc. · Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. v. Wallace · Intermarque Automotive Products, Inc. v. Feldman · Disco MacHine of Liberal Co. v. Payton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“rule 34.5(c) does not permit the record in a restricted appeal to be supplemented unless it is clear that the item to be considered was before the trial court when it rendered the default judgment,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.