Aswegan v. Bruhl’s Empirical Analysis
113 F.3d 109 · 1997
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2016
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on More v. Farrier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we need not decide, and the district court should not have decided, whether correctional facilities are subject to the ADA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the cable television sought by Aswegan is not a public service, program or activity within the contemplation of the ADA,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.