State v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2024
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kent v. United States · State v. Richie · Fujioka Ex Rel. Fujioka v. Kam · State v. Ildefonso · State v. Hoglund
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an appellate court will not pass issues dependent upon credibility of witnesses and the weight of the evidence; this is the province of the trial judge.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is clearly erroneous when (1) the record lacks substantial evidence to support the finding, or (2) despite substantial evidence in support of the finding, the appellate court is nonetheless left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he granting or denial of a motion for new trial is within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.