Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 N.C. App. 605 - State v. Jacob

113 N.C. App. 605 - State v. Jacob’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably 139 N.C. App. 299 - State v. Thompson (2000), 172 N.C. App. 42 - State v. Delsanto (2005)

29 state decisions

130199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Morgan · State v. DeLeonardo · State v. Ysaguire · State v. Jones · State v. Shamsid-Deen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the remoteness in time was due to [the] defendant's having almost no access to the daughters of his first marriage following his divorce.... [The victim] was not born until [4 years after the defendant's divorce], and did not reach a prepubescent age until several years later.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he remoteness factor must be examined carefully to determine whether the plan or scheme of molestation was interrupted or ceased due to underlying circumstances, and then resumed in a continual fashion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “North Carolina courts have been consistently liberal in admitting evidence of similar sex offenses in trials on sexual crime charges.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.