113 N.J.L. 305
174 A 507
Decided September 27, 1934
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1934-09-27
Cited by 4 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1940
3 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“for the reasons expressed in the opinion”
quoted by 1 later decision, including Broderick v. Rosner
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1934-09-27
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
¶2 For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heheb, Perskie, Yak Busicirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.
¶3 For reversal — The Chancellor. 1.