Williams v. Harriott

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 9, 1935

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1935-10-09

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1935

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1935-10-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Pee Curiam.

¶1 The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

¶2 For affirmance —The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 13.

¶3 For reversal — None.

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Case posture

Posture: On appeal from the Supreme Court in which Mr. Justice Bodine filed the following opinion: The defendant, Harriott, appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. There was a nonsuit as to the corporate defendant. The plaintiff's injuries were suffered while chatting with friends standing by a car parked along a road side. The car was properly lighted and well off the traveled portion of the highway. The defendant's car was identified by one of the persons sitting in the parked car as the instrumentality of injury. The plaintiff, immediately after the injury, was taken to police barracks and troopers shortly thereafter apprehended the defendant, who admitted that while driving on the road where the accident occurred, he had struck something but had not troubled to see what had happened. The defendant's car bore evidence of an impact with the car where the plaintiff had been standing. The issues of negligence and contributory negligence raised by the pleadings and proofs were properly submitted to the jury. It would have been clear error to grant either the motion or a nonsuit or a direction of a verdict. The other grounds of appeal are not argued, and hence must be regarded as abandoned, but even so we have examined them and they possess no merit. The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Source: CourtListener

Court

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Parallel citations

180 A 851