115 N.J. Super. 6 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2006
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Brown · 102 N.J. Super. 512 - City of East Orange v. TP. OF LIVINGSTON · The CITY OF EAST ORANGE v. Township of Livingston · STATE BY HIGHWAY COMM'R. v. Dilley · State v. Longo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any person who, with intent to prejudice, injure, damage or defraud any other person: a. Falsely makes, alters, forges or counterfeits any record or authentic matter of a public nature or character, or any printed or written instrument or indorsement, acceptance, transfer or assignment thereof; or b. Utters or publishes as true, any such false, altered, forged or counterfeited matter, knowing the same to be false, altered, forged or counterfeited Is guilty of a high misdemeanor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the `person' defrauded within the meaning of forgery statutes can be a governmental unit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“there was no proof that anyone was defrauded by said utterance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.