116 N.J. Eq.
Volume 116 — New Jersey Equity Reports
77 opinions
- 116 N.J. Eq. 1Green v. Carroll (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 4Lyndhurst v. United Cork Cos. (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 20In Re Hudspeth (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 46Jarvie v. Jarvie (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 49Brown v. Brown (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 51Smith v. Norton-Latham Co., Inc. (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 59Bugbee v. Mills (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 67In Re Pplication for Habeas Corpus Giamportone (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 70Rose v. Rein (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 75Traudt v. Traudt (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 81Reuther v. Fidelity Union Trust Co. (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 87City of Hackensack v. Winne (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 94In Re the Estate of Kuhn (1934)
“The decedent died December 5th, 1932. He was ninety-one years old and had been totally blind twenty-five years. He left him surviving a wife, eighty-four years old, mentally weak several years and subsequently committed to an insane-asylum; also, by his first wife, a child — -a married daughter who had lived with him the greater part of her life and had kept house for him and her stepmother several years, and a. granddaughter. He had no children by his second wife.
- 116 N.J. Eq. 101Second Nat. Bank of Paterson v. Curie (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 111Sears v. Grover (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 119Cooper v. Schanck (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 124Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators & Paper Hangers of America, Local 213 v. Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators & Paper Hangers of America (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 124Brotherhood L. 213 v. Brotherhood, D.P.H. (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 126Baader v. Mascellino (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 131Richman v. Bauerle (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 139People's Bldg., C., Atlantic City v. Ogden (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 139People's Building & Loan Ass'n of Atlantic City v. Ogden (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 145Kauder v. Lautman (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 145Kauder v. Lautman (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 146Bayonne Textile Corp. v. American Federation of Silk Workers (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 175G. O. K. Enterprises, Inc. v. Moos (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 201Federal Trust Co. v. Cohen (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 204Dorrance v. Thayer-Martin (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 208Di Brigida v. Di Brigida (1934)
“This is a suit for support and maintenance under section 36 of the Divorce act. Abandonment is alleged to have occurred on March 5th, 1933: An answer was filed, pleading a Nevada decree of divorce. Held: nevertheless, that the injunction was obligatory upon him. See, also, Kempson v. Kempson, 63 N. J. Eq. 783, and cases therein cited.
- 116 N.J. Eq. 228Kelly v. Middlesex, C., Trust Co. (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 245Munson Dye Works v. Jersey City (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 247Sellitto v. Heating and Plumbing Finance Corp. (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 311Cameron v. Penn Mutual Life Ins. Co. (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 331Stevens v. Busch Cl. and Dyers Ser. (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 348Walgreen Co. v. Moore (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 355Dornbusch v. Board of Adjustment of Newark (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 407Stanley-Fabian Corp. v. H.J. Theatrical (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 431Grbac v. Bodone (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 446Noel v. Teffeau (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 450Wernick v. Wernick (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 454Lane v. Bogert (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 466Barr v. Belmar (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 479Maul v. Thayer-Martin (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 487American League, C., Hudson Co. v. Eastmead (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 490Wootton v. Pollock (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 515Leonard D. Sylvester v. Giovannone C. (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 521Restful Slipper v. United, Union (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 529DeCorso v. Concordia Fire Insurance (1934)
“Complainant is the owner of real estate encumbered by a mortgage held by defendant Magnetic Building and Loan Association. As additional security for the mortgage loan, complainant furnished a fire policy issued by the defendant Concordia Fire Insurance Company on which was endorsed the usual mortgagee clause in favor of the building and loan association.
- 116 N.J. Eq. 531Gluckman v. Roberson (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 537Friedlander v. Grand (1934)
The vice-chancellor delivered the following opinion: “The legal remedy of complainant, in case he is wrongfully evicted by his landlord, is an action for damages or ejectment. Miller v. Kulschinski, 92 N. J. Law 97; 36 C. J. 70. But he may have an injunction against interference of his possession by the landlord if the circumstances of the case disclose that the relief at law is inadequate and that the injury will be irreparable.
- 116 N.J. Eq. 539Balint v. Kalita (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 540Gould v. Commercial Trust Co. (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 540Gould v. Commercial Trust Co. of N.J. (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 542Donnelly v. Slaughter (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 542Donnelly v. Slaughter (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 543Heller v. Heller (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 548Jersey City Welding & MacHine Works, Inc. v. Hudson County White Co. (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 550Allen v. Logan (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 553Bloomfield Bank & Trust Co. v. New York Sash & Door Co. (1934)
“The Bloomfield National Bank agreed to lend Temple B’Nai Zion and Jewish Community Centre $25,000 to build a temple, to be advanced as the building progressed, the last payment, $6,500, upon completion. The security was a mortgage on the temple payable in one year. Within the year the bank advanced $18,500. The structure was not finished when the mortgage fell due, October 25th, 1929, and it was not substantially completed until a year thereafter.
- 116 N.J. Eq. 556Gilson v. Gilson (1934)
“Defendant counter-claimed, charging extreme cruelty. 1-Iis counter-claim was dismissed. A decree nisi for complainant was entered September 6th, 1932. By an opinion filed April 27’th, 1933, the court of errors and appeals directed reversal thereof.
- 116 N.J. Eq. 565In re the appeal from the decree or order of the prerogative court (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 565In Re Peake (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 566In Re the Estate of Pettigrew (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 567Lint-Buscher-Ross Building & Development Corp. v. Estate of Henry E. Brinkerhoff, Inc. (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 568Munson Dye Works v. Mayor, C., Jersey City (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 573Hart v. Seacoast Credit Corp. (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 574Kelly v. Middlesex Title Guarantee & Trust Co. (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 575Fitzsimons v. Irwin Realty Co. (1934)
“The bill alleges that the complainant was the owner of a mortgage on real estate in Atlantic City, New Jersey, to secure the sum of $25,000; that on January 27th, 1933, complainant assigned the mortgage to the Irwin Realty Company to secure a note in the sum of $7,500; that contemporaneously with the assignment aforesaid, complainant entered into a separate agreement with defendant and assigned certain shares of building and loan stock as security for the performance of…
- 116 N.J. Eq. 579C. W. Reichwald, Inc. v. United States Radiator Corp. (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 584Stevens v. Atlantic & Security Mutual Associations (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 586Scheno Trucking Co., Inc. v. Bickford (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 587Piper v. Piper (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 589Zweig v. Zweig (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 590Guise v. John C. Guise, Inc. (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 592Victor Talking Machine Co. v. Caubre (1934)
“ ‘2. The release mentioned in the fourth defense of the answer was obtained by false and fraudulent representations in that defendant promised plaintiff to pay his medical bills; pay him $2,000 and give him his job for life, which plaintiff accepted, and when defendant paid plaintiff the $2,000, defendant asked plaintiff to sign said release which plaintiff signed, though unable to see to read at that time, on the assurance of defendant that said release was a paper…
- 116 N.J. Eq. 596Journal Square National Bank v. Hetherington (1934)
- 116 N.J. Eq. 597Woodruff v. Freehold Trust Co. (1934)