116 N.J.L. 90
182 A 626
Decided January 31, 1936
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1936-01-31
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1992
1 district · 1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1936-01-31
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
¶2 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 10.
¶3 For reversal — None.