117 N.J.L. 442
188 A 918
Decided January 22, 1937
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1937-01-22
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1937-01-22
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 1972
1 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
¶2 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Case, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 11.
¶3 For reversal — None.