Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 118 FAPPX 799 - Frank v. Harris County

Frank v. Harris County’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2024

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

40200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Faragher v. City of Boca Raton · Monge v. California · Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth · Lee Evans v. The City of Houston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no authority for the proposition that a single 'express rejection' to [a supervisor] constitutes as a matter of law a protected activity for purposes of retaliation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.