119 N.J.L. 429
197 A 5
Decided January 26, 1938
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1938-01-26
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1938-01-26
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 1988
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
¶2 For affirmance — The Chahcelloe, Paekee, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Deae, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeeety, JJ. 9.
¶3 For reversal — None.