¶1The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
¶2For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 11.
¶3For reversal — HEHER, J. 1. *431
