Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 F.1d 37 - Jackson v. Foote

Jackson v. Foote’s Empirical Analysis

12 F. 37 · 1882

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
December 1891
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on J. B. Lyon & Co. v. Culbertson, Blair & Co. · Pixley v. Boynton · Wolcott v. Heath · Cole v. Milmine · Gregory v. King

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defendant having delivered these notes with his guaranty upon them to Hooker & Co. in settlement of their demand against him, even though their demand was tainted as a gambling claim at common law, he cannot be allowed to set up the illegality of the dealings between himself and Hooker & Co. as a defence to these guarantees in the hands of a bonafide holder.. He has put this paper, with his guaranty affixed to it, afloat upon the market. Unless a clear case of violation of the statute is made out, and the burden of making such a case is upon the defendant, this guaranty in the hands of a bonafide holder for value is valid, and not tainted by any of the defences between the original parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.