Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 122 F.2d 511 - Chrestensen v. Valentine

Chrestensen v. Valentine’s Empirical Analysis

122 F.2d 511 · 1941

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
January 1944
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 41

Relies on Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · Yick Wo v. Hopkins · United States v. American Trucking Associations · Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization · Thornhill v. Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Handbills, cards and circulars.—No person- shall throw, cast or distribute, or cause or permit to be thrown, cast or distributed, any handbill, circular, card, booklet, placard or other advertising matter whatsoever in or upon any street or public place, or in a front yard or court yard, or on any stoop, or in the vestibule or any hall of any building, or in aletterbox therein; provided that nothing herein contained shall be deemed to prohibit or otherwise regulate the delivery of any such matter by the United States postal service, or prohibit the distribution of sample copies of newspapers regularly sold by the copy or by annual subscription. This section is not intended to prevent the lawful distribution of anything other than commercial and business advertising matter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.