Bejarano v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Nika v. State (2008), Rippo v. State (2006)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Blakely v. Washington · Crawford v. Washington · Gregg v. Georgia · Murray v. Carrier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“legal basis for the claim was not reasonably available”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A] rule is new when it overrules precedent, disapproves a practice sanctioned by prior cases, or overturns a longstanding practice uniformly approved by lower Carpenter decision was entered after Taylor's conviction had -iThe become final, and thus, his claim based on Carpenter could not have been raised on direct appeal. See NRS 34.810(1)(b), (3). 10 courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“establish that it is unconstitutional to proscribe certain conduct as criminal or to impose a type of punishment on certain defendants because of their status or offense or”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.