Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

124 Ind. 335

Snyder v. State ex rel. Fleming

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1890

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1890-06-18

<p>Assignment on Ebbobs. — Names of Parties Must be Given in Full. — The assignment of errors must contain the names of the parties to the cause in full. The assignment of errors is the appellant’s complaint, and the only parties before the Supreme Court, or over whom it acquires jurisdiction, are those whose names appear therein.</p>

Relies on Calvert v. State · Bacon v. Withrow · Thoma v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1890-06-18

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 1927

16 state decisions

601890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mitchell, J.

¶1William S. Fleming, as relator, instituted a proceeding in the Jay Circuit Court against the mayor and common council of the city of Portland, to compel that body by mandate to accept the proposal of,, and award the contract for, a certain street improvement to Judson A. Jaqua, who, it is alleged, submitted the lowest and best bid for the work in pursuance of notice duly given. The court overruled a demurrer to the complaint, and the defendants refusing to plead, judgment was given accordingly. From' this judgment an appeal was taken, which appellee moves to dismiss.

¶2The sixth rule of this court requires that “ the assignment of errors shall contain the full names of the parties.” In the assignment of errors the parties are thus designated: “State of Indiana, on relation of William S. Fleming, Appellee, vs. Frank H. Snyder, Mayor, et al.”

¶3This is in total disregard of the rule above referred to, and of the many decisions made in the enforcement of it. The assignment of errors is the appellant’s complaint, and the only parties before this court, or over whom it acquires jurisdiction, are those whose names appear therein. Thoma v. *336State, 86 Ind. 182, and cases cited ; Bacon v. Withrow, 110 Ind. 94; Calvert v. State, 91 Ind. 473.

Filed June 18, 1890.

¶4The motion to dismiss must be sustained. Appeal dismissed.

/124/ind/335 · .json · Public domain