125 Md. App. 428 - State v. Rodriguez’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Santobello v. New York · Hall v. State · Canaras v. Lift Truck Services, Inc. · State v. Brockman · Tandra S. v. Tyrone W.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Revisory Power of Court. For a period of 90 days after the imposition of a sentence, or thereafter, pursuant to a motion filed within that period, the court has revisory power and control over the judgment to set aside an unjust or improper verdict and grant a new trial. After the expiration of that period, the court has revisory power and control over the judgment only in case of fraud, mistake or irregularity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is directed to the sound discretion of the trial court and is not appealable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mitchell v. Green
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.