Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 ALA 104 - Henderson v. State

Henderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
August 1976
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 1976

9 state decisions

3019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There is an absence of evidence to show that any conversion or appropriation of the money occurred in Pike county.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.