Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 NEV 660 - Markowitz v. Saxon Special Servicing

Markowitz v. Saxon Special Servicing’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 58 Cal. 2d 23 - Stasher v. Harger-Haldeman · Leven v. Frey · Edelstein v. Bank of New York Mellon · Marquis & Aurbach v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of Clark · Leyva v. National Default Servicing Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Time and manner refers to when performance must take place and the way in which the deadline must be met.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “dictate who must take action and what information that party is required to provide”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The word 'shall' is generally regarded as mandatory.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.