Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 U.S. 104 - Richardson v. Green

Richardson v. Green’s Empirical Analysis

130 U.S. 104 · 1889

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
25
cited 25 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
November 2006
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions (25 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2006 · most notably Teague v. Regional Commissioner of Customs (1969), Washburn v. Green (1890)

28 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

2001889189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barton v. Barbour · Fosdick v. Schall · Hilton v. Dickinson · Credit Co. v. Arkansas Central Railway Co. · Killian v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It must be regarded as settled that: (1) Where an appeal is allowed in open court, and perfected during the' term at which the decree or judgment appealed from was rendered, no citation is necessary. (2) Where the appeal is allowed at the term of the decree or judgment, but not perfected until after the term, a citation is necessary to bring in the parties; but if the appeal be docketed here at our next ensuing term, or the record reaches the clerk’s hands seasonably for that term, and legal excuse exists for lack of docketing, a citation may be issued by leave of this court, although the time for taking the appeal has elapsed. (3) Where the appeal is allowed at a term subsequent to that of the decree or judgment, a citation is necessary, but may be issued properly returnable, even after the expiration of the time for taking the appeal, if the allowance of the appeal were before. (4) But a citation is one of the necessary elements of an appeal taken after the term, and if it is not issued and served before the end of the next ensuing term of this court, and not waived, the appeal becomes inoperative.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.