Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

111 U.S. 784

Killian v. Clark

Supreme Court of the United States

Submitted April 17th, 1884.

Decided May 5th, 1884.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1884-05-05

<p>APPEAL PROM THE.SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.</p>

2 counsel of record

Relies on Whiskey Cases v. Ford · Grigsby v. Purcell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1884-05-05

How this case has been cited

Cited by 138 later decisions (17 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2013 · most notably Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. Green (1946), Lawrence E. Sexton v. Leopold Louis Dreyfus (1902)

46 federal appellate · 11 district · 26 state decisions — followed in 16 states

31018841890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1APPEAL PROM THE.SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

¶2Appeal

¶3Grigsby v. Purcell, 99 U. S. 595, that"“-an appeal will be dismissed, when, at , the term to which it was returnable, the transcript was, by reason of the laches of the appellant,1 not filed, or the eause docketed in this court .” cited and affirmed.

¶4Mr. William J. Miller for appellants.

¶5Mr. Francis Miller for appellee.

¶6Mr. Chief Justice Waite

¶7delivered the opinion of the court.

¶8This appeal is dismissed. The decree appealed from.was entered on the 20th of May, 1878, ahd. an appeal afiowed these appellants in open court on the- 22d of May; No bond for thé appeal was given until the 7th of October,, 1881, the day on which the cause was for the first time-docketed here. The appeal of May 22d, 18.78, became inoperative by reason of the failure to give the necessary bond and docket the case here during, the October term, 1878, Grigsby v. Purcell, 99 U. S. 505, and the acceptance of the bond in October, 1881, cannot have the effect of an allowance of a new appeal, because it was more than two years after the decree had been entered.

¶9:Dismissed.-

/111/us/784 · .json · Public domain