Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

131 A.D.2d 287

In re Ribowsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1987-11-23

Decided 1987-11-23

¶1OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

¶2The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on *288October 18, 1972. By order of this court dated December 18, 1986, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law pending the outcome of this motion.

¶3On December 11, 1986, after a trial by jury, the respondent was convicted of perjury in the first degree (six counts) (Penal Law § 210.15), class D felonies, offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree (six counts) (Penal Law § 175.35), class E felonies, and conspiracy in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 105.05), a class A misdemeanor.

¶4Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), upon his conviction of a felony, the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State.

¶5Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. The respondent is disbarred and it is directed that the respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law forthwith.

¶6Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

/131/ad2d/287 · .json · Public domain