Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

132 N.J. 297

In re Bateman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 28, 1993

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1993-05-28

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1998

2 state decisions

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-05-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Supreme Court, recommending that MARC C. BATEMAN of OAKLAND, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, and who was thereafter temporarily suspended from the practice of law on April 12, 1990, and who remains suspended at this time, be suspended from practice for a period of two years, retroactive to April 12, 1990, for having been convicted of mail fraud conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 371 and 3623, and making a false statement on a loan application, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 1014 and 2, respondent having assisted in obtaining an inflated appraisal value of a property, and that *298conduct being in violation of DR 1-102(A)(3) and (4) and RPC 8.4(b) and (c);

¶3And good cause appearing;

¶4It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and MARC C. BATE-MAN is hereby suspended for a period of two years, retroactive to April 12, 1990, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

¶5ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

¶6ORDERED that respondent shall be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he shall comply with Regulation 23 of the Administrative Guidelines Governing Suspended Attorneys; and it is further

¶7ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

/132/nj/297 · .json · Public domain