State v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 921 So. 2d 587 - Borden v. East-European Ins. Co. · 868 So. 2d 512 - State v. McCormick · 489 So. 2d 1125 - State v. Saiez · 656 So. 2d 470 - Miele v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. · 685 So. 2d 1210 - State v. Dugan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is unlawful to counterfeit a payment instrument with the intent to defraud a financial institution, account holder, or any other person or organization.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“with a fictitious name, routing number, or account number.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.