State v. Cline’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2002
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Ruona · State v. Bosch · State v. Souhrada · State v. Holt · Oddo v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We think section 94-102 also shows legislative intent to negative the implied repeal contended for by the appellant. “ ‘The provisions of this code, so far as they are the same as existing statutes, must be construed as continuations thereof, and not as new enactments.’ Section 94-102, supra.” See Sekt v. Justice’s Court, 26 Cal.2d 297 , 159 P.2d 17 , 167 A.L.R. 833 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rozzell““* * * where a statute or section is amended by merely adding to or taking therefrom, the portion carried forward in the new act is not a new act, but has been the law since the beginning. ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rozzell““(T)he Legislature, by increasing the penalty, has clearly indicated that it intended that [the] particular offense be punished and not pardoned or forgiven.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Mangrum
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.