Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

135 Pa. 526

Black v. Oblender

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 2, 1890

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1890-06-02

No. 148 January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 42 May Term 1888, C. P. On April 27,1888, James Black, as surviving'trustee of Monterey Lodge, No. 242, I. 0. of O. E., brought assumpsit against Adam Oblender and Christian Scheafer. Issue. At the trial on December 3, 1889, it was shown that Adam Oblender was elected and qualified as the treasurer of the lodge for the term of one year, giving bond in fl,000 with Christian Scheafer as his surety.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1920

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1890-06-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Pee Curiam:

¶1Adam Oblender was the treasurer of Monterey Lodge, Independent Order of Odd Fellows, of Lancaster. The appellant, Christian Scheafer, was the surety on his official bond; and this suit was brought to recover the sum of $748.23, a balance admitted to have been in the hands of the said treasurer at the expiration of his term of office, and which he has never paid over to his successor in office. Ilis term ended on March 26, 1886. On that day he was re-elected for another year, but did not give bond for the term for which he was re-elected, and was not, therefore, qualified as treasurer for the second term. One E. E. Snyder was then elected treasurer, and on or about May 1, 1886, made demand on Oblender for the funds in his hands, which demand was not complied with. Had he given bond for the second term, and thus have succeeded himself as treasurer, there might have been a necessity of inquiring into the date when the actual default occurred. If the funds had been on hand on March 26,1886, and had passed into his custody as his own successor, there would not have been a der fault under the first bond. But he did not succeed himself; the money never passed out of his hands into the possession of any one authorized to receive it; his refusal to pay it when it was lawfully demanded made him a defaulter, and fixed the liability of his surety.

¶2Judgment affirmed.

/135/pa/526 · .json · Public domain