137 U.S. 63
Supreme Court of the United States
November 3, 1890.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1890-11-03
ORIGINAL. Not numbered. This was a petition for leave to file a petition for a writ ■ of habeas corptts.
1 counsel of record
Relies on Mirzan · Washington Market Co. v. District of Columbia
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Petition denied / appeal dismissed · 8–0 · Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1890-11-03
Cited by 24 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1990
10 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
B. W. Huntington, for petitioner.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner alleges that he is detained by the United States marshal for the southern district of New York, by virtue of an order purporting to be an order of the circuit court of the United States for the district of Colorado. The motion for leave to file a petition for the writ of habeas corpus is denied, upon the authority of Ex parte Mirzan, 119 U. S. 584, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 341, and cases cited.