Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

138 La. 652

Roe v. Caldwell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 13, 1915

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1915-12-13

Land, Judge. Action by Mrs. Indiana Roe, tutrix, and another, against W. T. Caldwell. From the judgment, defendant appeals. On motion to dismiss the appeal.

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

““No judgment can be rendered except as between litigants having capacity to stand in judgment."”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Miles v. Reclamation Oil Producing Ass'n

Relies on Consolidated Ass'n of the Planters v. Mason · Johnson v. Murphy · Succession of Bougère

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Appeal dismissed · Decided 1915-12-13

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 1969

6 state decisions

30191519201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1On Motion to Dismiss.

PROVOSTY, J.

¶2[1] This suit is in behalf of minors. At its inception they were represented in it by their mother and tutrix and by their stepfather, cotutor with their mother. After the judge had announced his decision and handed. down his written reasons, but before judgment had been signed, the mother died. This had the effect of putting an end to the tutorship, and leaving the minors unrepresented. The cotutor ipso facto ceased to be tutor. Hatcher v. Jackson, 21 La. Ann. 737; Marcade on article 396, C. N.; Mourlon on same article.

¶3[2, 3] Motion is made to dismiss the appeal on the ground that at the time the order for appeal was made the minors were unrepresented. Better say they were unrepresented before judgment, and that therefore no judgment could be rendered, as no judgment can be rendered except as between litigants having capacity to stand in judgment. In Edwards v. Whited, 29 La. Ann. 651, this court said:

“The court had no right to proceed after the death of Edwards. The decree is an absolute nullity.”

¶4See, also, Johnson v. Murphey, 124 La. 143, 49 South. 1007; La. Ins. Co. v. Costa, 32 La. Ann. 5; Succession of Pickett, 41 La. Ann. 882, 6 South. 655. In Dorsey v. Hills, 4 La. Ann. 106, this court said:

“The decree acquired no force until it was entered upon the records” — citing the articles of C. P. according to which (article 544) “all judgments * must be entered on the records,” and (article 546) “the judge must sign all final judgments.”

¶5In Consolidated, etc., Planters v. Mason, 24 La. Ann. 518, this court said:

“The judgment was not signed, and the appeal was nugatory.”

¶6See Succession of Bougere, 29 La. Ann. 378.

¶7The appeal is dismissed.

/138/la/652 · .json · Public domain