Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

138 Pa. 165

Schotte v. Meredith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 3, 1890

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1890-11-03

No. 211 October Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 258 March Term 1889, C. P. On February 23, 1889, Charles T. Schotte brought assump-sit against William B. Meredith, administrator of F. G. Schotte, deceased, to recover the sum of $2,000, with interest from February 23, 1886, payable under a contract for the sale of real estate. The defendant pleaded non-assumpsit.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1890-11-03

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1990

6 state decisions

2018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Cubiam :

¶1By the terms of the contract between F. G. Schotte and Charles T. Schotte, plaintiff, the former was to pay the consideration money thereof “ at any time within ten years from the first day of April, a. d. 1886.” The plaintiff claims that this means any time within ten years that he may require the money. The defendant is deceased, and this action was brought against his administrator. The latter contends that his decedent had ten years in which to pay the money. In this he is clearly right. A payment at any time within ten years, even upon the last day, would be a compliance with the contract. The language used is the equivalent of a promise to pay on or before ten years. The promisor may pay at any time; the promisee must wait the full time before he can sue. The plaintiff has made a foolish contract, and we cannot help him.

¶2Judgment affirmed.

/138/pa/165 · .json · Public domain