Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 F.3d 452 - Boehms v. Crowell

Boehms v. Crowell’s Empirical Analysis

139 F.3d 452 · 1998

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
March 2017
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Chapman v. AI Transport (2000), Harken Exploration Company v. Sphere Drake Insurance Plc (2001)

11 federal appellate · 2 district ·

140199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 16 U.S.C. § 831 (Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933) · 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 29 U.S.C. § 626 (§ 7 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 633A (§ 15 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 5 U.S.C. § 105

Relies on Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Ford Motor Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · Baxter v. Federal Communications Commission · Bodenheimer v. PPG Industries, Inc. · Bourque v. Powell Electrical Manufacturing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under [the] principle of sovereign immunity, the United States may not be sued except to the extent it consents by statute; any waiver of immunity must be unequivocally expressed, with all uncertainties being resolved in favor of the government.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.