¶1instructed the jury that if the defendant, during his term, brought the old wooden stable, and fixed it on the lot by posts inserted in the ground and leaning against the wall of a house on an adjoining lot, not belonging to the plaintiff, and before the expiration of the term removed the stable, without injury or damage to the soil or to the other buildings of the plaintiff, either by the erecting or continuance or the removal of the stable, it was lawful for him so to do. The plaintiff became nonsuit.
14 F. Cas. 868
Krouse v. Ross
U.S. District Court
Decided December 15, 1806
U.S. District Court · decided 1806-12-15
Special action on the case by a landlord against his tenant for removing a wooden shed during the term, which the defendant had erected during the term upon posts inserted into the ground to the depth of two feet, and leaning against the wall of a house situated on an adjoining lot not belonging to the plaintiff. contended that it was a general rule that, between landlord and tenant, things annexed by the tenant to the freeholder building, and which can be removed without…
Decided 1806-12-15