14 F. Supp. 2d 222 - Ladd v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2202 · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396D (§ 1905 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · United States v. W. T. Grant Co. · Amoco Production Co. v. Village of Gambell · Perez v. Ledesma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“immediate threat that the plaintiff will be wronged again”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.