KATIGBAK’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2019
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 11 I. & N. Dec. 493 - BRANTIGAN · ASUNCION · SHIN · PANGANIBAN
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“at a future date ... the beneficiary may become qualified under a new set of facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“was properly denied because the beneficiary was not at that time qualified,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Visas shall next be made available — — — to qualified immigrants . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. WING'S TEA HOUSE
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.