Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

381 U.S. 763

85 S. Ct. 1810

14 L. Ed. 2d 723

Docket No. 884, Misc.

Knowles v. Florida

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1965-06-07

Relies on Douglas v. People of State of California · Lane v. Brown · Raley v. Ohio

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1965-06-07

How this case has been cited

Cited by 143 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2001 · most notably United States v. Mitchell (1983), Donaldson v. United States (1971)

43 federal appellate · 1 district · 16 state decisions

47019651970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Walter Frank Knowles, pro se.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen. of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment dismissing the appeal is reversed. Raley v. State of Ohio, 360 U.S. 423, 437-440, 79 S.Ct. 1257 1265-1268, 3 L.Ed.2d 1344. Cf. Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477, 83 S.Ct. 768, 9 L.Ed.2d 892; Douglas v. People of State of California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811.

¶2

Mr. Justice STEWART would deny certiorari.

¶3

Mr. Justice CLARK and Mr. Justice HARLAN dissent.

/381/us/763 · .json · Public domain