Andre v. West’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 5107 · 38 U.S.C. § 5109A · 38 U.S.C. § 7105 · 38 U.S.C. § 7251 · 38 U.S.C. § 7252 · 38 U.S.C. § 7261
Relies on In re Reidt · Donovan v. West · Russell v. Principi · Maggitt v. West · Hensley v. West
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unassailable premise that [the court does] not have jurisdiction to review a claim of CUE unless it has been previously adjudicated by the Board.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Andre v. Principi
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.