State v. Nejin

Decided October 16, 1916

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1916-10-16

<p>Appeal from City Court of Shreveport; David -B. Samuel, Judge.</p> <p>P. A." Nejin was convicted of operating a blind tiger in violation of law, and he appeals.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1916-10-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1958

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

O’NIELL, J.

¶1The defendant was found guilty of operating a blind tiger, in violation of Act No. 8 of Í915, was sentenced to pay a fine and be imprisoned, and has appealed. He relies upon a bill of exceptions reserved to the overruling of his motion in arrest of judgment. The grounds urged in the motion and the issues presented in this appeal are identically like those in the case of State v. Emile, 74 South. 163, ante, p. 829, No. 22210, in which the conviction and sentence were this day affirmed.

¶2Por the reasons assigned in that case, the conviction and sentence herein appealed from are affirmed.