State v. Johnston’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 2024
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. McDonald · 15 Cal. App. 400 - People v. Walker · 55 Cal. App. 37 - People v. Hamby · 3 Utah 2d 129 - State v. Wellard · Cline v. Tait
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The failure of the county attorney to endorse the name of a witness on the information was not error where the failure was inadvertent and the county attorney timely informed the court-appointed counsel for the defendant of the omission and of the intention to move the court for an order permitting the endorsement of the witness on the information. To defendant’s specification 5, that the court misdirected the jury in a number of instances, we find no merit. The defendant alleges that instruction 16 which contains part of section 93- 2001-1, R.C.M.1947, was incomplete, in that it covered only subdivisions 1, 2, 4 and 6, and, that the court in leaving out sub-divisions 5 and 7 completely failed to properly instruct the jury on the pertinent provisions of such section which would have been favorable to the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Romero““ * * * without unnecessary delay * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Maldonado
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.