Reginelli v. Boggs

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 7, 2016

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2016-07-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2018

1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“1. Whether the Superior Court's holding directly conflicts with previous Superior Court holdings that an outside entity can be appointed or retained by a hospital to conduct peer review and that the review is entitled to protection under the [PRPA]? 2. Whether the Superior Court's holding directly conflicts with the intent of the [PRPA] and this Court's holdings that the provision of peer review materials to the hospital does not constitute a waiver of the [PRPA]?”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Reginelli v. Marcellus Boggs, M.D., Monongahela Valley Hosp., Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2016-07-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2AND NOW, this 7th day of July, 2016, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are GRANTED, limited to the following issues, as stated by petitioners:

1. Whether the Superior Court’s holding directly conflicts with previous Superior Court holdings that an outside entity can be appointed or retained by a hospital to conduct peer review and that the review is entitled to protection under the Pennsylvania Peer Review Protection Act?

2. Whether the Superior Court’s holding directly conflicts with the intent of the Peer Review Protection Act and this Court’s holdings that the provision of peer review materials to the hospital does not constitute a waiver of the Peer Review Protection Act?

¶3These matters are to be listed for argument with the petitions granted at 39 & 40 WAL 2016.