Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

142 N.J. 617

In re Rushfield

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 4, 1995

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1995-12-04

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1023 (§ 103 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1131 (§ 501 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Decided 1995-12-04

¶1ORDER

¶2The Disciplinary Review Board having on August 23,1995, filed with the Court its decision concluding that MARK C. RUSH-FIELD of ROSELAND, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, should be reprimanded on the basis of a guilty plea to a three-count federal information charging respondent with violating the ERISA-reporting provisions of 29 U.S.C. § 1023 and § 1024, misdemeanor offenses under 29 U.S.C. § 1131, and respondent having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined, and good cause appearing;

¶3*618It is ORDERED that MARK C. RUSHFIELD is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

¶4ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

¶5ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

/142/nj/617 · .json · Public domain