Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 Cal. 320 - Huston v. Anderson

Huston v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

1904

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
5
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2009

1 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

4019041910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. McMillan v. Sadler · Stewart v. Kyser · Smith v. Thomas · Hannah v. Green · Stinson v. Sweeney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The mere intention to acquire a new residence, without the fact of removal avails nothing, neither does the fact of removal without the intention.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.