Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

145 F. 627

Docket No. 1,485.

Standard Computing Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1906.)

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1906-05-12

<p>Appeal — Reversal—^iNSurvicncxcY or Record.</p> <p>Where the record fails to show facts essential to a proper decision of the case by the appellate court, it will reverse the decree on its own motion, and remand the ease for a rehearing with directions to permit the taking of further evidence.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1938

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Barber v. Coit

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1906-05-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal — Reversal—^iNSurvicncxcY or Record.

¶2Where the record fails to show facts essential to a proper decision of the case by the appellate court, it will reverse the decree on its own motion, and remand the ease for a rehearing with directions to permit the taking of further evidence.

¶3Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan.

¶4Charles H. Fisk, for appellant.

¶5Paul A. Staley and Border Bowman, for appellee.

¶6PER CURIAM.

¶7The court finds itself unable, upon the transcript from the court below, to determine with any degree of certainty the rights of the parties to this litigation.

¶8It is therefore ordered, upon our motion, upon authority of Barber v. Coit, 118 Fed. 272, 55 C. C. A. 145, and the cases there cited, that the decree of the court below be set aside, and the case remanded to the court below, with direction to remand to the rules, with leave to both parties to take such additional evidence as they may be advised. The appellant will pay all of the costs of this appeal. The costs below will abide final decree there.

/145/f1d/627 · .json · Public domain